Comments on: Windows XP vs. 7 Boot Speed Test http://www.teic.ie/2009/11/windows-xp-vs-7-boot-speed-test/ Irish for tech. Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:46:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Eoin O'Mahony http://www.teic.ie/2009/11/windows-xp-vs-7-boot-speed-test/comment-page-1/#comment-42 Eoin O'Mahony Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:42:21 +0000 http://www.teic.ie/?p=436#comment-42 "Can’t believe I was compelled to watch two computers booting up." +1 and then lol! “Can’t believe I was compelled to watch two computers booting up.”

+1 and then lol!

]]> By: Adam http://www.teic.ie/2009/11/windows-xp-vs-7-boot-speed-test/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Adam Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:05:20 +0000 http://www.teic.ie/?p=436#comment-39 Well it is clearly better than Vista, but in more ways than not Vista was a step back for most users. Do bear in mind that this is the Ultimate edition running on a netbook - MS recommend Starter only at that spec. Well it is clearly better than Vista, but in more ways than not Vista was a step back for most users.

Do bear in mind that this is the Ultimate edition running on a netbook – MS recommend Starter only at that spec.

]]> By: Thomas Brunkard http://www.teic.ie/2009/11/windows-xp-vs-7-boot-speed-test/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Thomas Brunkard Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:55:32 +0000 http://www.teic.ie/?p=436#comment-38 Can't believe I was compelled to watch two computers booting up. Seems Windows 7 is really a step back to something that always worked rather than a progression to something better. My Mac would have booted up twice in that time. My old 8 year old G4 tower I mean... Can’t believe I was compelled to watch two computers booting up. Seems Windows 7 is really a step back to something that always worked rather than a progression to something better. My Mac would have booted up twice in that time. My old 8 year old G4 tower I mean…

]]>